Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at $8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

PSC 104A University of California San Diego Hypothetical Fact Pattern Paper

PSC 104A University of California San Diego Hypothetical Fact Pattern Paper

Question Description

Hello Everyone, I have a question for law class. I will post the question here, the answer needs to be from 8-9 sentences.

I will post some attachments here that can help you answer the question.

HERE IS THE QUESTION:

QUESTION D:

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF HYPOTHETICAL FACT PATTERN

Overall Background: You are a staff attorney working for Senator Regina Regulator, who has long been concerned about the dangers posed by “assault weapons” (one definition of which is “a semi-automatic rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds”). Lately, Senator Regulator has become alarmed by media reports about a growing practice among gun enthusiasts who are also do-it-yourselfers — making functioning assault weapons from spare gun parts in their home workshops. Possession of such homemade assault weapons is not currently prohibited by federal gun-control laws.

Senator Regulator sends you a memo outlining two possible ideas for federal laws to respond to this growing threat. She asks for your advice about whether either of these Proposals would stand up to a court challenge if adopted.

Proposal 1 would amend the Gun Control Act of 1968 (“GCA”). In the GCA Congress enacted what one court called “a detailed and comprehensive statutory regime designed to protect individual firearm ownership while supporting federal, state, and local law-enforcement officials in their fight against crime and violence.” Generally, the GCA divides firearms into different types and adopts various limitations on their sale, purchase, or transfer. Given the heightened lethal potential of assault weapons, the Act imposes more severe penalties on their sale, distribution or purchase.

Proposal 1 would add a legal prohibition on “constructing or possessing” a homemade assault weapon. Senator Regulator writes, “Let’s assume that, if we get to the ‘substantial effect’ test, we can justify the ban on construction or possession. But, I’d like you to address a threshold question: Is the ‘substantial effect’ test even available to defend Proposal 1? Specifically, I’m concerned that, because merely making or possessing such a weapon does not involve selling or exchanging it for economic consideration, a court might conclude that Proposal 1 exceeds Congress’ constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.”

Proposal 2 would respond to news reports that current members of the U.S. military make up a large segment of homemade-assault-weapon makers. Senator Regulator finds it “especially dangerous” that persons the U.S. government has trained to be effective killers would engage in this practice. (Plus, she thinks it “looks bad” for the military’s image and thus could erode public support.)

Relying on its power in Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 14 to “make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces,” Congress would through Proposal 2 provide for the immediate removal from further service for any current military member found to have constructed, or to be in possession of, a homemade assault weapon. Among other concerns about the Proposal’s legality, Senator Regulator is worried that service members could argue that what they do in their workshops in their “spare time” outside of official duties is not a concern falling within the Rules and Regulation power Congress is relying on.

As a Common Question for both Proposals, Senator Regulator’s memo ends as follows: “I suppose any law restricting gun rights is subject to a challenge that it violates the Constitution’s Second Amendment protection for the right ‘to keep and bear Arms.’ Don’t analyze this in detail, but do let me know in a sentence how the Second Amendment argument might figure in a court’s assessment of whether either Proposal is lawful.”

The Question Prompt: CHOOSE Proposal 1 OR Proposal 2. Then

–BRIEFLY STATE the relevant legal criteria by which a court would analyze whether it is within Congress’ constitutional authority

AND

–BRIEFLY EXPLAIN how a court applying the relevant legal criteria would likely rule on the Proposal’s constitutionality

AND

–BRIEFLY DRAW A COMPARISON to ONE CASE we studied in the course.


"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.