Select Page

Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at \$8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

## PBH 592 Excelsior College Mod 6 Hypothesis Testing Paper

### Question Description

Can you help me understand this Statistics question?

“The only relevant test of the validity of a hypothesis is comparison of prediction with experience.”

~Milton Friedman

#### Introduction

Continue with hypothesis testing using SPSS for one of the two research questions. One question uses a continuous response and categorical explanatory variable (two or three).

Be sure to watch the lectures and go over this before beginning this assignment as the parameter, the nature of the hypotheses, the statistical test needed, etc. do change when the data type changes, so you will not be performing a correlation test for these two questions.

# One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Test Using SPSS (Links to an external site.)

#### Instructions

The five steps are:

1. Define the parameter of interest (i.e. µ),
2. State the Null and Alternative hypotheses (i.e. (Null: µ1 = µ2) for independent samples t-test),
3. Determine the test statistic and p-value considering any necessary assumptions,
4. Decide whether to reject or not reject the null hypothesis,
5. Clearly state a conclusion in the context of the problem.

Your document should be approximately 1-2 pages in length. Clearly separate out each step of the testing process using headings, or numbering as modeled in the example provided. If you use references, use of current APA formatting is required. Any tables and graphs must be clearly labeled.

References

## Rubric

PBH592 M6.1 Evaluate: Continuous Versus Categorical

PBH592 M6.1 Evaluate: Continuous Versus Categorical

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines the parameter of interest for research question

 15.0 pts Proficient You accurately define the parameters of interest for your remaining two selected research questions. You explicitly state how you arrived at your definitions and assumptions applied. 8.0 pts Needs Improvement You were unable to accurately define the parameters of interest for your research questions, and/or to state how you arrived at your definitions and assumptions applied. There are numerous errors or missing elements. 0.0 pts No Submission Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStates the hypotheses

 15.0 pts Proficient Your hypotheses are accurately stated using appropriate terms and is testable. You have provided accurate formulas for the hypotheses. 11.0 pts Satisfactory Your hypotheses are accurately stated using appropriate terms and are generally testable. There are one or more minor issues to address to test the hypotheses. You have provided accurate formulas for the hypotheses. 8.0 pts Needs Improvement Your hypotheses are not accurately stated, use incorrect terms, and/or are not testable as formulated. You have provided inaccurate formulas for the hypotheses. 0.0 pts No Submission Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerforms test statistic

 20.0 pts Proficient You chose the right statistics for your hypotheses and variables. You performed the statistics, with p-values, accurately. You verified your assumptions. 15.0 pts Satisfactory You chose the right statistics in general for your hypotheses and variables. You performed the statistics, with p-values. You verified your assumptions. There are several minor errors or missing elements. 11.0 pts Needs Improvement You chose test statistics for your hypotheses and variables, and you performed the statistics. There are numerous errors or missing elements, and/or assumptions are not verified. 0.0 pts No Submission Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides decision to reject/NOT reject null hypothesis (PO 2)

 20.0 pts Proficient You provide a clearly stated one-sentence decision for each hypothesis on whether or not to reject the null hypothesis. Your decisions are based on the statistical results. 11.0 pts Needs Improvement You provide a decision on whether or not to reject the null hypotheses; however, your decisions are not based on the statistical results. 0.0 pts No Submission Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides well written conclusion (PO 2)

 20.0 pts Proficient Your conclusion is clearly stated, describes the outcome of your testing, and contextualizes your results with your research questions. 15.0 pts Satisfactory Your conclusion describes the outcome of your testing, and contextualizes your results with your research questions. Several points need further clarification to connect results with the research question. 11.0 pts Needs Improvement You have provided a conclusion; however numerous areas need further clarification. 0.0 pts No Submission Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSyntax, mechanics, & APA formatting

 10.0 pts Proficient Clearly and consistently uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. If references are used, APA formatting is consistently accurate. 3.5 pts Satisfactory Uses proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few minor errors, which do not interfere with meaning. If references are used, APA formatting is accurate most of the time. 2.5 pts Needs Improvement There are many grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with meaning. If references are used, APA formatting is incorrectly applied most of the time. 0.0 pts No Submission No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

## Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.