Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at $8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

NR 507 Chamberlain College of Nursing Week 6 Pathophysiology Urticaria Discussion

NR 507 Chamberlain College of Nursing Week 6 Pathophysiology Urticaria Discussion

Question Description

WEEK 6: Discussion

Advanced PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Requirements:

A 12-year-old boy is brought to the office for evaluation of hives. He has no significant past medical history and no history of allergies. He has just joined the middle school soccer team and noticed that he gets hives about 10 minutes into practice. The hives are itchy and consist of irregular blotches on his legs and trunk, about 10–20 cm in size, and they persist for about 30 minutes. He does not experience swelling of the lips or oropharynx and denies any wheezing or shortness of breath. His physical examination is normal without skin lesions or oral swelling at that moment, and his lungs are clear. After evaluation, he is diagnosed with urticaria.

  1. Discuss the likely cause of the patient’s urticaria.
  2. Describe the cellular mechanism of urticaria and how it leads to the signs and symptoms experienced by the patient.
  3. Describe the relationship between the patient’s symptoms and the concept of inflammation.
  4. What pharmacological and non-pharmacologic?treatment options are available??
  5. Discuss the complications of urticaria.
  6. What teaching would be appropriate to provide the parent and child about urticaria?
  7. Support your response with at least one current evidence based resource

DISCUSSION CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Description

Application of Course Knowledge

30

30%

  1. Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant, evidence based outside sources, AND
  2. Posts are on topic and answer all presented questions which demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic.
  3. Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life, AND
  4. Decisions are well supported with evidence-based arguments that are in-line with the scenario; AND
  5. Proper rationale and reasoning skills are demonstrated; AND
  6. Information is taken from source(s) with appropriate interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis of the topic

Support From Evidence Based Practice

30

30%

  1. Discussion post is supported with appropriate, scholarly sources; AND
  2. Sources are published within the last 5 years (unless it is the most current clinical practice guideline (CPG); AND
  3. Reference list is provided and in-text citations match; AND
  4. Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions

Interactive Dialogue

30

30%

  1. Student provides a substantive* response to at least two topic-related posts of a peer; AND
  2. Evidence from appropriate scholarly sources are included; AND
  3. Reference list is provided and in-text citations match; AND
  4. Student responds to all direct faculty questions OR if student was not asked a direct question, student responds to either a 3rd peer post or a faculty question directed towards another student

(*) A substantive post adds new content or insights to the discussion thread and information from student’s original post is not reused in peer or faculty response

90

90%

Total CONTENT Points= 90 pts

DISCUSSION FORMAT

Category

Points

%

Description

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation

10

10%

Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one error.

Direct quotes in discussions are limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote adds substantively to the discussion.?

(*) APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

10

10%

Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts

DISCUSSION TOTAL=100 points


"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.