Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

Starting at $8.00 per Page

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to Your instructions!

glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

DNP 816009 Northern Kentucky University Quantitative Article Critique

DNP 816009 Northern Kentucky University Quantitative Article Critique

Question Description

This assignment will consist of a quantitative article critique with a focus on the methods, statistics, analysis and interpretation. It will be important to analyze and evaluate the article not just summarize – for example it is not enough to say the sample size was adequate. You should state the sample size and state why you know it was adequate. Do NOT cut/paste from the article- this is YOUR interpretation and analysis of the article. If you use Polit or another source to substantiate your comment, then reference the source. Do not include quotes in the critique.

If you want more specifics to help you with the critique: check out Polit & Beck, (2017) on p:291- Box 13.3 and 13.4 (p. 304 in 11ith edition, Box 14.3 and 14.4) guideline for critiquing data collection plans in quantitative studies and structured data collection methods; Box 16.1 on p. 371- guideline for critiquing descriptive studies (11th Ed, p. 381, Box 17.1), p. 399-guideline for critiquing bivariate inferential analyses Box 17.1 (11th Ed [/ 4-8. Box 17.1), p. 457- Box 20.1- guidelines for critiquing interpretations in discussion sections of quantitative research reports (11th Ed. Box 21.1, p, 465). These guidelines break down the components of the critique process for quantitative research.

Write your critique directly into the rubric. Do not do it in paragraph form.

Research Critique Introduction

Research Critique Introduction Transcript.docx

Actions

This assignment enables the learners to meet Course SLO #1

FAQ on Critique

Example: article: Surgical Patient Satisfaction A Descriptive and Correlational Study.pdf

Actions

undefinedsample onlyundefineddo not useundefinedSurgical Patient Satisfaction Sample Quantitative Critique Rubric 5.25.2020.docx

Actions

Quantitative Critique Rubric 5.25.2020.docx

Actions

Choose from the list of articles attached. DO NOT USE YOUR OWN ARTICLE. YOU MUST CHOOSE FROM THE ARTICLES BELOW:

1. 2020. Klotzbaugh et al. Results_and_implications_from_a_gender_minority..pdf

Actions

2. 2016 Jarrell_MentorshipNeedsNoviceNPs.pdf

Actions

3. 2019 Potts. Teaching it forward.educating parents about hpv hpv vaccine.pdf

Actions

4. 2018 National Study of Nursing Research characteristics at magnet designaed hospitals.pdf

Actions

Please note: Be sure to use a model such as Johns Hopkins Evidence Level and Quality Guide (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)or another of your choice to identify the level of evidence of one of the articles above

Rubric

Quantitative Critique Rubric:5.25.20

Quantitative Critique Rubric:5.25.20

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntent of the research: is the title clear?

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is the RQ if stated? What is the hypothesis if stated? (3) What are the issues or variables being studied? What are the IV and DV variables? (3)

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance of the study: How is the research problem significant to nursing, How will the findings improve practice (5 points)

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods: What is the study design? Describe. Was this appropriate? (5) What is the level of evidence in this research? Describe the model used to evaluate level of research. (3)

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWas the sample randomized or not randomized? (3) Was the process of sample selection addressed? Was the sample size adequate? Was a power analysis done? (3) What evidence was provided that biases were eliminated or minimized? What steps were taken to control confounding participant characteristics that could affect the equivalence of groups being compared? Were these steps adequate? (6)

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods: What were the inclusion and exclusion criteria? (3) Describe the instrument used- was it reliable/valid? Is this addressed? (3)

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProcedures: Describe how the data was collected. Was it consistent? (3) Was the DV always obtained in the same manner? (3)

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis: What type of analysis was done? Identify the statistics used- appropriate for level of measurement? All assumptions met? (5) Was analysis appropriate for the design/methods used? Was rational provided for the use of statistical tests? (3)

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWere the relevant sample demographics described? (3) Were they used to answer RQ when inferential statistics would have been more appropriate? (3) What were the results of the study? (3) Were any results significant? What do the tests tell about the RQ or hypotheses? (3) Were any tests non-significant? Is it plausible that these reflect a Type II error? (3) What factors might have undermined the study’s statistical conclusion validity? (3)

18 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWas an appropriate amount of statistical information reported? Are the findings clearly and logically organized? (3) Were tables or figures used to summarize large amounts of statistical information? (3)

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults and interpretation: What was the researcher’s interpretation of the results? Do the results make sense? (3) Did the researcher draw reasonable conclusions? (3)

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDo the researchers discuss the limitations of the study and their possible effects on the credibility of the research? (3) Did the researchers discuss the generalizability of the results? (3) Did the researchers discuss the implications for clinical practice? (3)

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat is your interpretation of the results? (3) How would you improve upon this study if you were to conduct a similar study? (3)

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCan the study results make an important contribution? (3)

3 pts

Total Points: 100

PreviousNext


"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter


1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.