Patton uses the term preponderance of evidence to describe the best fit between the data a researcher gathers and the patterns and conclusions he or she draws (as quoted by Merriam & Tisdell, 2016, p. 249). This is a term borrowed from courtroom procedure, where it is the standard of proof used in noncriminal cases. In the legal context, a judge or jury must find that a given fact is proven if, based on the evidence provided. it is more likely than not (or to >50% likely) to be true. In your opinion, is this an appropriate standard for the validation of qualitative research? Why or why not? (Make sure to use appropriate support for your position).
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."